中老年人腹主动脉钙化与腰椎骨密度的相关性研究
The relationship between abdominal aortic calcification and bone mineral density in the elderly population
  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006.7108.2017.12.008
中文关键词:  骨质疏松  腹主动脉钙化  腰椎骨密度(BMD)  定量CT(QCT)  年龄
英文关键词:Osteoporosis  Abdominal aortic calcification  Bone mineral density (BMD)  Quantitative computed tomography (QCT)  Age
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(81330043,81472139);北京市科委项目(D131100005313013);国家科技部十二五支撑计划项目(2012BAI10B02)
作者单位
刘红敏1 程晓光2 王玲2 杜霞1 焦俊1* 1.贵州医科大学第一附属医院放射科贵州 贵阳550004 2.北京积水潭医院放射科北京 100035 
摘要点击次数: 798
全文下载次数: 580
中文摘要:
      目的 研究中老年人腹主动脉钙化(AAC)与腰椎定量CT(QCT)骨密度(BMD)的相关性。方法 纳入2013年至2016年间招募的593名40~80岁(男性230人,女性363人)的健康志愿者测量受检者身高、体质量、腰围,计算体重指数 (BMI);进行腰椎QCT骨密度测量,将原始图像传至图像后处理工作站,采用Mindways QCT pro软件,分别测量L1-3椎体骨密度。应用ImageJ软件测量腹主动脉钙化面积比。结果 男、女性AAC患病率分别约为45.65%、28.37%;与无AAC组比较,男性、女性AAC组年龄更大,并且与腰椎BMD的差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05);男女腰椎BMD均与年龄呈负相关(r=–0.49、r=–0.73, P<0.05),与BMI均无明显相关性(r=0.02、r=0.01, P>0.05);男、女性AAC均与年龄呈正相关(r=0.39、r=0.42, P<0.05),与BMI均无明显相关性(r=–0.03、r=–0.03, P>0.05);男性BMD与AAC无明显相关性(P=0.15),女性BMD与AAC呈低度负相关(r=–0.32, P<0.05),校正年龄以后,女性BMD与AAC也无明显相关性(P=0.08)。结论 年龄为腹主动脉钙化和骨质疏松发病的共同独立的危险因素,校正年龄后,男性、女性腰椎BMD与AAC均无显著相关性。
英文摘要:
      Objective To investigate the relationship between abdominal aortic calcification and bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine in the elderly population. Methods Totally 593 healthy volunteers (230 men and 363 women), aged 40 to 80 years, were recruited from 2013 to 2016. Height, weight and waist circumference were measured, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) measurements were conducted and the original images were transmitted to the image post processing workstation. Using Mindways QCT Pro software, vertebral bone mineral density of L1-3 was measured. Using ImageJ software, abdominal aortic calcification was measured. Results The prevalence of AAC in male and female was 45.65% and 28.37%, respectively. Men and Women with AAC were older and had significantly lower lumber spine BMD than subjects without AAC (P<0.05). The correlation of BMD with age was statistically significant in men and women (r=–0.49 and r=–0.73, respectively, both P <0.05). There were no significant correlations between BMI and BMD in men and women (r=0.02 and r=0.01, respectively, both P >0.05). The correlation of AAC with age was statistically significant in men and women (r= 0.39 and r=0.42, respectively, P <0.05). There were no significant correlations between BMI and AAC in men and women (r=–0.03 and r=–0.03, respectively, both P >0.05). There were no significant correlations between BMD and AAC in men (P =0.15). BMD was negatively correlated with AAC in women (r=–0.32, P <0.05), but the correlation was no longer significant after adjustment for age (P =0.80). Conclusion Age was an independent risk factor for abdominal aortic calcification and osteoporosis. There was no significant correlation between BMD and AAC in men and women after adjusting for age.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭
function PdfOpen(url){ var win="toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=yes,menubar=yes,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes"; window.open(url,"",win); } function openWin(url,w,h){ var win="toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=no,menubar=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=no,width=" + w + ",height=" + h; controlWindow=window.open(url,"",win); } &et=6A5EFA635696B2E574B7777CA522DEF18AC6B859B164CE6C5C3C5BDB4F91C00B6E5B56D80540FDCA06F496C38250E834FE684AA3E8DCCCA7A77541DB94141CE76792917228D455B6E1924BC9A4690F8E94EA30BF51528FF11CC3178E0BB3F24C279DCC74905BAB19F2F31DF75D25AD50&pcid=A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC&cid=527A01A248DACB72&jid=CA678592D11E309E8E3FB3B2BFE9BE1A&yid=FA004A8A4ED1540B&aid=C5C8E058F245A0E42178078520CDCDE2&vid=&iid=59906B3B2830C2C5&sid=3ACD4359575EFDCA&eid=6DC9B9BB39B3E540&fileno=201712008&flag=1&is_more=0"> var my_pcid="A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC"; var my_cid="527A01A248DACB72"; var my_jid="CA678592D11E309E8E3FB3B2BFE9BE1A"; var my_yid="FA004A8A4ED1540B"; var my_aid="C5C8E058F245A0E42178078520CDCDE2";