骨质疏松女性股骨颈骨折与股骨转子间骨折的髋部骨密度差异分析
Analysis of the difference of hip bone density between femoral neck fracture and intertrochanteric fracture in women with osteoporosis
  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7108.2020.10.019
中文关键词:  骨质疏松性骨折  股骨颈骨折  股骨转子间骨折  骨密度
英文关键词:osteoporotic fracture  fracture of femoral neck  intertrochanteric fracture  bone mineral density
基金项目:
作者单位
吴少明1 谢俊杰1 刘夏莹2 卢天祥1* 吴世强3 吴文华3 1.福建医科大学附属泉州第一医院骨科福建 泉州 362000 2.泉州市妇幼保健院 儿童医院产前诊断中心福建 泉州 362000 3.福建医科大学附属第二医院骨科福建 泉州 362000 
摘要点击次数: 582
全文下载次数: 340
中文摘要:
      目的 明确骨质疏松女性股骨颈骨折与股骨转子间骨折的髋部骨密度差异,探讨骨质疏松患者发生髋部骨折(股骨颈骨折、股骨转子间骨折)与骨折部位骨密度的相关性。方法 回顾性分析2015年1月1日至2016年12月31日期间于福建省某三级甲等医院的住院治疗的骨质疏松及髋部骨质疏松性骨折患者172例,其中无病史的原发骨质疏松患者109例、骨质疏松性股骨颈骨折患者39例、骨质疏松性转子间骨折24例。分别统计3组患者年龄、体质指数、糖尿病患病情况、骨折侧别、髋部各部位骨密度、血清I型胶原交联C末端肽(C-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of type I collagen,CTX)、I 型原胶原N-端前肽(procollagen type I N propeptide,PINP)、25羟基维生素D(25-OH-D)。分别进行三组间及两两组间比较。结果 三组间年龄、体质指数、糖尿病患病率差异无统计学意义(F=2.667,P=0.072;F=0.882,P=0.416;χ2=3.216,P=0.232),股骨颈骨折组与股骨转子间骨折组组间骨折侧别差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.958,P=0.328),三组间髋部Ward区骨密度差异无统计学意义(F=2.937,P=0.056),髋部骨密度比较,股骨颈、股骨大转子、股骨转子间、髋部整体差异有统计学意义(F=7.825,P=0.001;F=8.668, P<0.001;F=9.657,P<0.001)。股骨颈骨折组、转子间骨折组股骨颈、股骨大转子、股骨转子间、髋部整体骨密度均小于骨质疏松组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);股骨颈骨折组与转子间骨折组股骨颈、大转子、转子间、髋部整体骨密度差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。三组间β-CTX、P1NP、维生素D差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。股骨颈骨折组、转子间骨折组β-CTX、维生素D均小于骨质疏松组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);转子间骨折与骨质疏松组P1NP差异无统计学意义,股骨颈骨折组与转子间骨折组股骨颈、大转子、转子间、髋部整体骨密度差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 女性骨质疏松患者发生髋部骨折的类型可能并不取决局部的骨密度,可能与骨微结构等因素相关,要得到明确、可靠的结果仍需进一步研究证实。
英文摘要:
      Objective To determine the difference of hip bone mineral density between femoral neck fracture and intertrochanteric fracture in women with osteoporosis, and to explore the correlation between hip fracture (femoral neck fracture, intertrochanteric fracture) and bone mineral density at the fracture site in patients with osteoporosis. Methods A retrospective analysis of 172 patients with osteoporosis and hip osteoporotic fractures who were hospitalized in a tertiary A hospital in Fujian Province from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2016, including 109 cases of patients with a history of primary osteoporosis, 39 patients with osteoporotic femoral neck fracture, 24 cases of osteoporotic fracture between the rotor. The age, body mass index, prevalence of diabetes, fracture side, bone density of each hip area, C-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of type I collagen,procollagen type I N propeptide, 25-OH-VitD were calculated respectively. Comparisons were made among three groups and two groups. Results There were no significant differences in age, body mass index, and diabetes prevalence among the three groups (F=2.667, P=0.072; F=0.882, P=0.416; χ2=3.216, P=0.232). There was no statistically significant difference in hip ward area density difference between the femoral neck fracture group and the femoral intertrochanteric fracture group(χ2=0.958, P =0.328), and there was no statistically significant difference in the bone mineral density of the hip ward area among the three groups (F=2.937, P=0.056).The comparison of hip bone mineral density, femoral neck, femoral greater trochanter, between the femur rotor, hip overall were statistically significant (F=7.825,P<0.05,P=0.001; F=8.668, P<0.001; F=9.657,P<0.001).The overall BMD of femoral neck, greater trochanter, intertrochanteric and hip in the femoral neck fracture group and the intertrochanteric fracture group were all lower than those in the osteoporosis group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The overall BMD of femoral neck, greater trochanter, intertrochanter and hip in the femoral neck fracture group and the intertrochanteric fracture group were not statistically significant (P>0.05). There were significant differences in β-CTX, P1NP and vitamin DT among the three groups (P<0.05). The β-CTX and vitamin DT of the femoral neck fracture group and the intertrochanteric fracture group were less than those of the osteoporosis group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in P1NP between the intertrochanteric fracture group and the osteoporosis group, and there was no statistically significant difference in bone mineral density between the femoral neck fracture group and the intertrochanteric fracture group in the femoral neck, greater trochanter, intertrochanter, and hip (P>0.05). Conclusion: The type of hip fracture in female patients with osteoporosis may not depend on the local bone density, but may be related to bone microstructure and other factors. It may be a clear and reliable study that needs further research to confirm.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭
function PdfOpen(url){ var win="toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=yes,menubar=yes,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes"; window.open(url,"",win); } function openWin(url,w,h){ var win="toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=no,menubar=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=no,width=" + w + ",height=" + h; controlWindow=window.open(url,"",win); } &et=6FD48CA0A0DD47593B531C92A19AC7AF29C15C42BE4DA983B4C7410ABFBB8E4D3D2D10F9185BDC0270DB4F9B569E7D801617E435C731C05C2CA9AB77438540B7E9F5082BAD945D9D230257863ADFDDFA8529A043CC04978E2AC3D4DC080625E67AAFA7E5A60CE2DD100D21387C19D76BA103C2A277F4A2A59D7FAD7F39D0CAE1C1CE8AB676CD9147&pcid=A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC&cid=527A01A248DACB72&jid=CA678592D11E309E8E3FB3B2BFE9BE1A&yid=0D1D160AB8016934&aid=C0104404FB29B4D4158079A1C8679EEF&vid=&iid=F3090AE9B60B7ED1&sid=4C25EB18BC5AA509&eid=613AB8EA456E1FCE&fileno=20201019&flag=1&is_more=0"> var my_pcid="A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC"; var my_cid="527A01A248DACB72"; var my_jid="CA678592D11E309E8E3FB3B2BFE9BE1A"; var my_yid="0D1D160AB8016934"; var my_aid="C0104404FB29B4D4158079A1C8679EEF";