IOF骨质疏松风险一分钟测试题联合定量超声骨密度筛查骨质疏松症的诊断价值
The diagnostic value of IOF one-minute risk test combined with quantitative ultrasonic screening for osteoporosis
  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7108.2021.09.018
中文关键词:  IOF  定量超声骨密度  骨质疏松症
英文关键词:IOF  quantitative ultrasound  osteoporosis
基金项目:四川省卫生与计划生育委员会科研项目(18PJ352)
作者单位
杨帆1 蒋小波2 曹洪义1 宁蓬1 冯秋1 曾静1 陈敏1 刘虹蝶1 万海艳1 陈应辉1 * 1.成都市第五人民医院内分泌代谢科 四川 成都 611130 2.成都市第五人民医院心血管内科 四川 成都611130 
摘要点击次数: 306
全文下载次数: 245
中文摘要:
      目的 以双能X线骨密度( DEX) 测定为诊断骨质疏松症的金标准,评价IOF骨质疏松风险一分钟测试题(IOF)、定量超声骨密度(QUS-T)诊断骨质疏松症(OP)的切点值及单独或联合运用筛查骨质疏松症的诊断价值,以期找到更为行之有效的骨质疏松症筛查工具,为该人群骨质疏松症的早期诊断提供参考和依据。方法 选取400名成都社区绝经后妇女和年龄大于50岁的男性为研究对象,设计问卷调查表,收集受试者基本人口学资料、病史资料、骨质疏松症相关危险因素,并对400名受试者进行IOF骨质疏松风险一分钟测试题、定量超声骨密度测定及双能X线骨密度( DEX) 测定。结果 单独运用IOF、QUS-T作为筛查标准时ROC曲线下面积分别是0.676、0.832,切点值分别是:6.5、?2.75,其约登指数分别是0.278、0.527,具有一定的诊断价值;IOF联合QUS-T作为筛查标准时,ROC曲线下面积是0.834,以Y =23.196,此时灵敏度为 64.8 %,特异性为91.1 %,约登指数为0.559;QUS-T与IOF并联时即满足IOF≥6.5或 QUS-T≤?2.75其中之一即可诊断为骨质疏松症,其灵敏度为77.84 %,特异性为76.7 9%,约登指数为0.546;串联即同时满足IOF≥6.5和QUS-T≤?2.75即诊断为骨质疏松症,其灵敏度为 29.55 %,特异性为 96.43 %,约登指数为0.260,具有较高的诊断价值。结论 单独或联合运用IOF骨质疏松风险一分钟测试题、定量超声骨密度筛查骨质疏松症具有一定的诊断价值,但仍有待进一步验证。
英文摘要:
      Objective To evaluate the the diagnostic value of IOF one-minute risk test combined with quantitative ultrasound screening for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Methods Four hundred postmenopausal women and men older than 50 years old were selected as the research subjects. A questionnaire was designed. Data of population, disease history, and osteoporosis-related risk factors of the subjects were collected. IOF one-minute osteoporosis risk test (IOF), quantitative ultrasound (QUS-T), and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEX) were examined. Results When IOF and QUS-T were used as the screening criteria alone, the area under the ROC curve was 0.676 and 0.832, and the cut-off point was 6.5 and ?2.75, and the Yoden indexes were 0.278 and 0.527, respectively. When IOF combined with QUS-T was used as the screening standard, the area under the ROC curve was 0.834, with Y=23.196, and the sensitivity and specificity were 64.8%and 91.1%, respectively. When osteoporosis was diagnosed either with IOF ≥ 6.5 or with QUS-T ≤ ?2.75, the sensitivity was 77.84%, the specificity was 62.05%, and the Yoden index was 0.5463. When osteoporosis was diagnosed together with IOF ≥ 6.5 and QUS-T ≤ ?2.75, the sensitivity was 29.55%, the specificity was 96.43%, and the Yoden index was 0.2598. Conclusion The use of IOF and QUS-T alone or in combination to screen for osteoporosis has a certain diagnostic value, but it still needs further verification.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭
function PdfOpen(url){ var win="toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=yes,menubar=yes,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes"; window.open(url,"",win); } function openWin(url,w,h){ var win="toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=no,menubar=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=no,width=" + w + ",height=" + h; controlWindow=window.open(url,"",win); } &et=FE7DF9FF133D7CEE4AE0BC2069906FDFE51E030AF43DBB0B4F3001AB9E83EBB4DAC36EED5D3372EC50C642BE29EC2FE1FECFCB2D56DD7369BFA5062D78A02AA6F51A068FC8F31FC688572AFEF5A926A34B67116E34F981CF4A5CB0449000ACB73258AE98052BC80A8CFE8B47971749EFE03FD5246D417015&pcid=A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC&cid=527A01A248DACB72&jid=CA678592D11E309E8E3FB3B2BFE9BE1A&yid=9475FABC7A03F4AB&aid=2CE8721B9CD45E9219A137086EE86434&vid=&iid=9CF7A0430CBB2DFD&sid=59D5B0EDB2D8DABC&eid=CFAA3F3C4CFB19D349662B2DF69503C7&fileno=20210918&flag=1&is_more=0"> var my_pcid="A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC"; var my_cid="527A01A248DACB72"; var my_jid="CA678592D11E309E8E3FB3B2BFE9BE1A"; var my_yid="9475FABC7A03F4AB"; var my_aid="2CE8721B9CD45E9219A137086EE86434";