系统评价穴位敷贴辅助治疗骨质疏松的临床疗效及安全性
Clinical efficacy and safety of acupoint application in the adjuvant treatment of osteoporosis: A systematic evaluation
  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7108.2025.01.014
中文关键词:  穴位敷贴  骨质疏松症  临床疗效  安全性  系统评价
英文关键词:acupoint application  osteoporosis  clinical effect  security  meta-analysis
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(82274272);浙江省中医药重点研究项目(2022ZZ020);浙江省教育厅项目(Y202248737)
作者单位
孟世龙1 李威1 张徐1 童铭豪1 余阳1 史晓林2 张伟3 刘康2,3* 1.浙江中医药大学第二临床医学院浙江 杭州 310005 2.浙江中医药大学附属第二医院浙江 杭州 310005 3.浙江中医药大学附属第二医院仙居分院浙江 台州 317399 
摘要点击次数: 105
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      目的 系统评价穴位敷贴辅助治疗骨质疏松的临床疗效及安全性,为其临床应用提供相应循证依据。方法 检索中国知网、万方、维普、PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane Library 7个数据库中穴位敷贴治疗骨质疏松的相关文献,检索时间自建库以来至2024年3月1日。采用RevMan 5.4软件和Cochrance偏倚风险评价工具2.0版(RoB 2.0)进行文献偏倚风险评价和统计分析。结果 本研究纳入12篇文献,涉及1104位受试者。相较于对照组(单纯药物治疗),治疗组(穴位敷贴+药物治疗)在总有效率、VAS评分、ODI评分以及骨密度等方面的治疗效果更佳,差异具有统计学意义。共25例患者接受穴位敷贴后出现了不良反应,不良反应发生率为4.39%,主要表现为皮肤过敏。结论 穴位敷贴辅助治疗骨质疏松的临床疗效和安全性较好,值得临床工作中推广应用。此外,穴位敷贴疗法在药物和穴位的选择上具有多样性,治疗标准方面较难统一,相关研究之间可能具有潜在异质性,未来需要更多高质量的临床研究证实。
英文摘要:
      Objective To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of acupoint application in the adjuvant treatment of osteoporosis, and to provide the corresponding evidence-based basis for clinical application. Methods The literature related to acupoint application in osteoporosis treatment was searched from 7 databases, including CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library from the establishment of the database to March 1, 2024. Literature bias risk assessment and statistical analysis were performed using RevMan 5.4 software and the Cochrane Bias Assessment Tool for Randomized Controlled Trials (RoB 2.0). Results A total of 12 articles were included in this study, involving 1104 subjects. Compared to the control group (drug therapy alone), the treatment group (acupoint application + drug therapy) had better therapeutic effects in terms of total effective rate, VAS score, ODI score, and bone mineral density, and the difference was statistically significant. A total of 25 patients had adverse reactions after receiving acupoint application therapy. The incidence of adverse reactions was 4.39%, mainly manifesting as skin allergy. Conclusion The clinical efficacy and safety of acupoint application in the adjuvant treatment of osteoporosis are good and worthy of application and promotion in clinical work. In addition, acupoint application has diversity in the selection of drugs and acupoints. It is not easy to unify the treatment standards. There may be potential heterogeneity among related studies. This needs more high-quality clinical studies to confirm in the future.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭
function PdfOpen(url){ var win="toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=yes,menubar=yes,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes"; window.open(url,"",win); } function openWin(url,w,h){ var win="toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=no,menubar=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=no,width=" + w + ",height=" + h; controlWindow=window.open(url,"",win); } &et=3C06DB566315F8DC78C14CE21C0BF806B69C0C8A723229A4B427A127DD327CFFF8204C960780D2D575D4972C7D18206DE90EDF44B6CF683E10B44A482604AB06AB47286F9262549A8C523C102EB43292EBBC0A0615751D51994E43BE1E64C4CB99C941D5D6309F22605810B68FDDB94D932351A4F2FE8DAC&pcid=A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC&cid=527A01A248DACB72&jid=CA678592D11E309E8E3FB3B2BFE9BE1A&yid=E6A891D2134F30C0&aid=&vid=&iid=CA4FD0336C81A37A&sid=06EA2770E96C5402&eid=CFAC5CB624A41AFD&fileno=202501014&flag=1&is_more=0"> var my_pcid="A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC"; var my_cid="527A01A248DACB72"; var my_jid="CA678592D11E309E8E3FB3B2BFE9BE1A"; var my_yid="E6A891D2134F30C0"; var my_aid="";